Autism and Communication

Getting one’s needs met and to exist happily in one’s family, community and beyond is dependent on the ability to communicate.   As non-autistic individuals we can use ourselves to communicate our needs and express our feelings.  The autistic individual depending on their functioning level, has anywhere from extremely limited (nonexistent in some) to some ability to ask for their needs to be met.  Some people with autism seem to communicate by perseverating on a topic that seems to not relate at all to whatever the topic might be.   For example, one child may become fixated on televisions and only be able to talk about this subject, no matter what else is being discussed.  It is not unusual for autistic individuals to seem to come out of “left field” with what they might say.   For example, the topic may be “going to the grocery store and what will be bought at the store.”  The child may say, “you are pretty.”

There are also individuals who are nonverbal, those who use echolalia and still others that can only express their needs by reversing their pronouns.  When they want a cookie to eat, instead of saying “I want a cookie,” the child may say, “you want a cookie.” 

Let’s make sense of what is going on.  If as I am suggesting the child has not had the benefit of an attachment, lacks the ability to use him/herself in relationship to others and is also in a state of dissociation with varying degrees of consciousness then I would continue to propose that the child’s ability to communicate is going to be compromised.  Let me explain how these different elements contribute to not only problems in communicating, but also relating to others. 

It is important to remember that the autistic individual wants to communicate and in fact is always communicating about himself even though he may be nonverbal, echolalic or reversing pronouns.  He is like any human being in that he has a need to communicate.  Unfortunately, because he has had an incomplete attachment, he cannot identify his feelings, which are dissociated, and therefore cannot use those feelings to express his needs.  In other words, he has not developed to a level where he has self-agency.  This means he literally cannot ask for anything for his own benefit.  This is not a physical problem, but instead a “developmental problem” that can change over time.

It is my opinion, that what one sees with the nonverbal autistic child is the reverse of what one sees with a “typical” child.  I call this phenomenon “Inside out, upside down.”  In other words, the unconscious part of the child is on the outside and the conscious part is in the inside.  That is why some nonverbal autistic children seem out of control and low functioning, but with the use of a computer can communicate beautifully in writing.  This is a very good example of the split or dissociation of the self.  Most people are unfamiliar with seeing the ‘unconscious.’  Because most people are unfamiliar with the workings of the unconscious, autistic individuals are constantly misunderstood. 

The phenomenon of echolalia is also something that can be understood.  One first needs to remember that the autistic child has minimal and varying (depending on their functioning level) ability to use oneself in relationship to others.  Also it is important to remember that a lack of attachment precludes one from being able to use one’s self.  Thus echolalia is the result of not being able to use one’s self.  The child only has access to what they hear.  They may hear “do you want a cookie?”  Developmentally all the child can do is mimic the other person.  There is no awareness and ability to use the self in response to the other.  Thus the end result is a repetition of what the child heard. 

The child who reverses his pronouns and uses ‘you’ to mean ‘I’ is beginning to use his self with others.  The child uses ‘you’ because it is safer than ‘me or I.’ The autistic child does not feel safe in the world.  Everything is confusing, awkward and anxiety producing.  The use of ‘you’ as it refers to the self is another example of dissociation.  As I mentioned before the child is split.  As the child develops and he becomes less split and gains more agency, he will then move to using the pronoun ‘me’ and finally as he has more and more access to himself, he will be able to use ‘I.’ There seems to be a direct correlation to the use of ‘I’ and ability to know and access feelings and use them in relationship to others.

Now lets look at why the communication of autistic individuals appears inappropriate.  First of all, I believe that an autistic individual is always communicating his state of existence.  Unfortunately, most perceive these communications from their own experience, which includes having completed the attachment process.  In working with autistic individuals, many try to extinguish the “odd” behaviors of the child.  In doing so, we are not understanding the message the child is trying to communicate through his strange behaviors.  We in a sense are helping them feel misunderstood versus understood and not seen versus seen.  Instead these communications need to be understood within the context of a child who has never attached and cannot use the self to communicate.  Every behavior that the child uses can be understood and must be understood so that the child can gain understanding and recognition, which are precursors to being able to attach.  Our work with the autistic person is to understand, validate, accept and recognize the autistic person.  If the caregiver or professional can recognize and see the child, then the child can start to see him or herself.   

In concluding, I want to restate that the perseverations, the out of context communications, the use of pronoun reversal, echolalia, nonverbal communication, to name only a few, can be understood through the lens of an “Incomplete Attachment” which leaves the individual in a state waiting for the completed attachment and without access to self or what I call self-agency. 

Autism and Communication